The Paradox of Decreasing Absolute Poverty Despite Growing Income Inequality in Russian Regions: An Evaluation of the Efficiency of Financial-Investment Models for Social Security
https://doi.org/10.26794/1999-849X-2026-19-1-136-153
Abstract
The paper’s subject is the financial-investment model of state and non-state social security (FIMSS) in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation and its efficiency in macroeconomic instability in 2022–2025. The research aims to identify systemic limitations of the current regional FIMSSs caused by the methodology for measuring the absolute poverty line, the structure of budgetary resource redistribution, and high regional differentiation of socio-economic conditions. The study’s significance hinges on the socio-economic inequality growth in Russia from 2022 to 2025, which, despite a stated drop in absolute poverty, reveals issues in the Russian social protection system. Given the economy’s reliance on raw materials, the concentration of high incomes, and significant interregional differences, improving the FIMSS is now a key goal of state financial policy, which intends to eliminate poverty and promote social justice, along with fostering sustainable economic growth. The empirical basis of the study was official statistical data for 2022–2023, provided by Rosstat and the Unified State Information System of Social Security. Methods of correlation and regression analysis were the author’s tools for identifying links between poverty indicators, inequality, and social spending. The paper focuses on evaluating the Gini income coefficient and poverty rates (both absolute and relative) relate, both linearly and non-linearly. It also examines per capita social protection spending and the macroeconomic characteristics of the regions. The study revealed that as the proportion of the population with incomes below the subsistence level decreased, income inequality grew. Under specific conditions of high inflation and fast nominal income growth, many people with incomes above the subsistence level are excluded from social support, resulting in “hidden poverty,” which is especially clear in places like Moscow. The author suggests a better approach to evaluating FIMSS’s efficiency by analyzing the ratio of actual per capita social policy spending for every 1% of the impoverished, adjusted by the regional subsistence minimum. The results lead to the conclusion that the current FIMSS fails systemically to curb socioeconomic inequality growth and ensure social stability in times of macroeconomic shocks. Restructuring the FIMSS should be based on a relative poverty line to increase social policy’s sustainability and targeting.
Keywords
About the Author
M. L. DorofeevRussian Federation
Mikhail L. Dorofeev — Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Assoc. Prof., Assoc. Prof. of the Public Finance Departmen, Financial Faculty
Moscow
References
1. Grishina E. E., Tsatsura E. A. The impact of the social support system on the poverty level in the regions. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii = Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2022;18(3):368-377. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.19181/lsprr.2022.18.3.8
2. Stroev P. V. The impact of the allocation of economic resources on the features of the spatial organizationof Russia. Ekonomika regiona = Economy of Regions. 2023;19(4):949-963. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17059/ekon.reg.2023-4-2
3. Kharchenko K. V. Smart territories ranking: Methodological foundations and key indicators. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo = Economics, taxes & law. 2025;18(5):79-90. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/1999-849X-2025-18-5-79-90
4. Krinichansky K. V., Yurevich M. A., Fatkin A. V. The finance and growth nexus in Russia: Does the SMEs channel matter? Voprosy Ekonomiki (Issues of Economics). 2023;(6):76-93. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2023-6-76-93
5. Orlova I. S. The social contract as an instrument of state policy to reduce poverty. Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie = Administrative Consulting. 2022;(1):139-146. (In Russ.).
6. Egorova S. V. The social contract as a trend of transforming the low-income state social support: Trends and risks. Semioticheskie issledovaniya = Semiotic Studies. 2023;3(3):67-76. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18287/2782-2966-2023-3-3-67-76
7. Bobkov V. N., Dzhandosova F. S., Buchkova Ya. Yu. The efficiency of the state welfare aid based on the social contract. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii = Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2015;(3):75-108. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.12737/13553
8. Dorofeev M. L. Development of the Methodology for Comprehensive Analysis of the Efficiency of the State Financial and Investment Model of Population Social Security Using the Example of Russian Regional Finance. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2023;27(4):54-65. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/2587-5671-2023-27-4-54-65
9. Shedko Yu.N., Ilyina I.Yu., Kvasov I. A. Using chinese experience in russian healthcare management. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo = Economics, taxes & law. 2025;18(5):112-121. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/1999-849X-2025-18-5-112-121
10. Tanasova A. S., Sokolova E.Yu., Shandra I. G., Chigireva A. V. Tax and foreign exchange factors of inequality (To posing a problem). Voprosy Ekonomiki (Issues of Economics). 2023;(1):146-159. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2023-1-146-159
11. Goncharenko L. I. Tax Preferences in the Spatial Development of the Country: Terminological Aspect of the Study. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2024;28(4):108-121. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/2587-5671-2024-28-4-108-121
12. Goncharenko L. I. Diversification of the tax system as a factor in the implementation of national development projects in Russia. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo = Economics, taxes & law. 2025;18(3):144-154. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/1999-849X-2025-18-3-144-154
13. Loseva O. V., Munerman I. V., Fedotova M. A. Assessment and classification models of regional investment projects implemented through concession agreements. Ekonomika regiona = Economy of Regions. 2024;20(1):276-292. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17059/ekon.reg.2024-1-19
14. Krivoruchko S. V., Rizvanova I. A. The development of the national payment infrastructure in the context of digitalization. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo = Economics, taxes & law. 2025;18(5):51-59. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/1999-849X-2025-18-5-51-59
15. Goncharenko M. A., Khatsko A. D. Tax instruments of influence on the development of the financial services market. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo = Economics, taxes & law. 2024;17(5):115-128. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/1999-849X-2024-17-5-115-128
16. Goncharenko L. I., Advokatova A. S., Batarin A. A. Identification of the obligation to fix calculations in the system of tax relations. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo = Economics, taxes & law. 2022;15(2):156-166. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/1999-849X-2022-15-2-156-166
17. Batarin A. A., Goncharenko L. I., Advokatova A. S. Tax evasion in retail markets: Causes and ways to overcome. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2025;29(1):119-132. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/2587-5671-2025-29-1-119-132
Review
For citations:
Dorofeev M.L. The Paradox of Decreasing Absolute Poverty Despite Growing Income Inequality in Russian Regions: An Evaluation of the Efficiency of Financial-Investment Models for Social Security. Economics, taxes & law. 2026;19(1):136-153. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/1999-849X-2026-19-1-136-153
JATS XML


