Inequality in Additional Vocational Education of citizens of Pre-retirement Age
https://doi.org/10.26794/1999-849X-2022-15-3-52-58
Abstract
The subject of the study is the problems of inequality in the education of citizens of pre — retirement age. The purpose of the work is to establish the causes of inequality of access of pre — retirees to education. It is believed that achieving the Sustainable Development Goals requires high-quality and affordable education, including pre-retirees. During the survey of citizens of pre-retirement age, it was revealed that the opportunities of this category of citizens in obtaining additional education are greatly reduced by both social and gender factors due to the uneven distribution of academic resources in terms of financing educational institutions, participation in the education process of qualified and experienced teachers, the availability of teaching tools, the list of technologies used. As a result of the study of the course of educational activities, it is concluded that the problem of inequality in education is largely present in the education of pre-retirees, which requires taking measures to possibly overcome this problem.
About the Author
M. V. Polevaya
Financial University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Marina V. Polevaya — Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Head of the Department of Psychology and Human Capital Development.
Moscow
References
1. Ferreira Francisco, Gignoux Jeremie. The measurement of educational inequality: achievement and opportunity. World Bank Economic Review. 2014;8(2):210–246.
2. Arifulina R. U., Katushenko O. A. Analysis of domestic and foreign trends in the individualization of the educational process at the university: an analytical report. Vestnik Mininskogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Minsk University. 2021;9(4):2. (In Russ.).
3. Sazonov B. A. Individually oriented organization of the educational process as a condition for the modernization of higher education. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher education in Russia. 2011;(4):10–25. (In Russ.).
4. Komleva, V. V. Accessibility and quality of higher education in the context of COVID-19: government efforts in the future. Voprosy upravleniya = Management issues. 2021;68(1);144–155. (In Russ.).
5. Konstantinovsky D. L. In Search of a source of educational inequality. Sotsiologicheskaya nauka i sotsial’naya praktika = Sociological Science and Social Practice. 2021;36(4):98–111. (In Russ.).
6. Hughes C., Acedo C. Guiding principles for learning in the twenty-first century (educational practices 28) / International Academy of Education. International Bureau of Education. URL: http://www.ibe.unesco.org/sites/default/files/resources/practices_series_28_v3_002.pdf.
7. Borgonovi F., Pokropek A. Birthplace diversity, income inequality and education gradients in generalized trust: the relevance of cognitive skills in 29 countries. OECD Education Working Paper. 2018;164:41.
8. Kilpi-Jakonen E., Vono de Vilhena D., Blossfeld H. P. Adult learning and social ine-qualities: Processes of equalization or cumulative disadvantage? International Review of Education. 2014;61(4):529–546.
9. James S. Coleman equality and achievement in education, Routledge, 2019, 340 p.
10. Bekova S. K., Terentiev E. A., Maloshonok N. G. Educational inequality in the context of the COVID 19 pandemic: the relationship between the socio-economic situation of the family and the experience of distance learning of students. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies. 2021;(1):74–92. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17323/1814–9545–2021–1–74–92
Review
For citations:
Polevaya M.V. Inequality in Additional Vocational Education of citizens of Pre-retirement Age. Economics, taxes & law. 2022;15(3):52-58. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/1999-849X-2022-15-3-52-58
Views:
11
Email this article 