Elimination of Economic Double Taxation of Dividends
https://doi.org/10.26794/1999-849X-2022-15-2-146-155
Abstract
The subject of the study is the mechanism for eliminating economic double taxation from participation in subsidiaries operating in the tax systems of the EU, G20 and the Russian Federation.
The purpose of the work is to diagnose this mechanism and develop directions for its improvement in Russia based on the use of best practices of foreign countries in order to increase the investment attractiveness of Russia. The article reveals theoretical approaches to the exclusion of economic double taxation, examines the content of the mechanism of exemption from tax of dividends received by parent companies — participants (shareholders), and also substantiates the importance of the mechanism of elimination of economic double taxation to attract investment in our country. The experience of the EU, G20 and Russia countries on the leveling of economic double taxation is systematized and generalized, and the rules for exemption from income tax on dividends are also given, for the analysis of which their decomposition and grouping by individual essential features based on the use of induction and deduction methods. Based on the results of the study, measures are proposed to improve the existing procedure for granting income tax benefits in respect of dividends received by a Russian participant (shareholder), including instruments that have successfully proven themselves in foreign jurisdictions.
The conclusion is made that structurally the Russian mechanism of elimination of economic double taxation fully corresponds to the best examples of international practice. Positively assessing the practice of applying the dividend benefit based on the minimum threshold of strategic participation, it is justified that this criterion of the materiality of investments should be supplemented by other criteria. The development of the mechanism for eliminating economic double taxation in Russia is seen in lowering the threshold of minimum participation to 10% and developing other criteria for applying the exemption of dividends, such as the condition for reinvesting the funds received into the Russian economy for a certain period of time.
Keywords
About the Authors
L. V. PolezharovaRussian Federation
Ludmila V. Polezharova — Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Assoc. Prof.; Department of Taxes and Tax Administration, Financial University, Advisor to the State Civil Service of the Russian Federation, 1st Class, Honorary Employee of the Ministry of Taxes and Duties of the Russian Federation, member of the International Tax Association IFA
Moscow
S. B. Razu
Russian Federation
Semen B. Razu — Tax Consultant of the PricewaterhouseCoopers Russia International Consulting Group
Moscow
References
1. Goncharenko L.I., Vishnevskaya N.G. Tax incentives for innovative development of industrial production based on the analysis of advanced foreign experience. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo = Economics, taxes & law. 2019;(4):121–130. (In Russ.).
2. Litzenberger R.H., Van Horne J.C. Elimination of the double taxation of dividends and corporate financial policy. The Journal of Finance. 1978;33(3):737–750.
3. Nasyrov I.N., Shtyrlyaeva E.V. The need to abolish double taxation of dividends. Finansy i kredit = Finance and credit. 2015;17(641):46–52. (In Russ.)
4. Harding M. Taxation of Dividend, Interest, and Capital Gain Income. OECD Taxation Working Papers, No. 19. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2013. 56 p.
5. Hines J.R., Park J. Investment ramifications of distortionary tax subsidies. Journal of Public Economics. 2019;172:36–51. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.11.002
6. Devereux M.P., Fuest C., Lockwood B. The taxation of foreign profits: a unified view. Centre for Business Taxation, University of Oxford: Working paper series; 2015. WP 15/04. 32 p.
7. Musgrave, P.B. taxation of foreign investment income: an economic analysis — Baltimore: John Hopkins Press, 1963. 140 p.
8. Musgrave R.B. Modern fiscal issues: essays in honour of carl shoup. Edited by R.M. Bird, J.G. Head. Canada: University of Toronto Press, 1972. 362 p.
9. Sorbe S., Johansson A. International tax planning and fixed investment. Paris: OECD Economics Departments Working Papers; 2017. 20 p.
10. Pogorletskiy A.I. Tax policy in the contemporary world: peculiarities and prospects, implementation in Russia. Journal of Tax Reform. 2017;3(1):29–42. DOI: 10.15826/jtr.2017.3.1.029
11. Graetz M.J., Warren Jr A.C. Dividend taxation in Europe: When the ECJ makes tax policy. Common Market L. Rev. 2007. V. 44. P. 1577.
12. Mirrlees J., Adam S., Besley T., Blundell R., Bond S., Chote R., Gammie M., Johnson P., Myles G., Poterba J. Tax by design. Oxford University Press. September 2011.
13. Kock J & Gérard M. The allowance for corporate equity in Europe: Latvia, Italy and Portugal. Proceedings. Annual Conference on Taxation and Minutes of the Annual Meeting of the National Tax Association. 2018;(111):1–40.
14. Pomerleau K., Bunn D., Locher T.Anti-Base Erosion provisions and territorial tax systems in OECD Countries. Fiscal Fact No. 772. Tax Foundation. July 2021. P. 2.
15. Hasegawa M. The effect of moving to a territorial tax system on profit repatriation: Evidence from Japan. Journal of Public Economics. 2017;(153):92–110.
16. Egger Peter, Valeria Merlo, Martin Ruf, Georg Wamser. 2012. Consequences of the New UK tax exemption system: evidence from micro-level data. CESifo Working Paper Series. No. 3942.
17. Polezharova L.V. Methodology of taxation and tax administration of transnational companies and beneficiaries: monograph. Moscow: Knorus; 2022. 400 p. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Polezharova L.V., Razu S.B. Elimination of Economic Double Taxation of Dividends. Economics, taxes & law. 2022;15(2):146-155. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/1999-849X-2022-15-2-146-155