Preview

Economics, taxes & law

Advanced search

Formation of Business Ecosystems in the Context of International Economic Constraints

https://doi.org/10.26794/1999-849X-2025-18-6-33-41

Abstract

The subject of the research is the institutional, organizational and market mechanisms of formation and transformation of business ecosystems in the context of sanctions pressure. The aim of the work is to identify the factors stimulating or constraining the development of ecosystem interaction in Russian companies, as well as to establish the nature and features of industry and intersectoral models that are formed in response to the disruption of global chains. The relevance is due to the unprecedented scale of modern sanctions restrictions against Russia and the lack of a full understanding of how they affect the structural organization of business. The hypothesis of the study is that international restrictions that hinder the development of Russian business ecosystems (through the severance of global ties) simultaneously stimulate their accelerated formation at the national and regional levels (through the need to replenish lost connections and markets). The methodological basis was an interdisciplinary approach combining the analysis of modern literature on the economics of sanctions and business ecosystems, a review of statistical data and cases of Russian companies, as well as a comparative analysis of the experience of other countries under sanctions. The results of the study showed that the largest Russian corporations have demonstrated high adaptability to external shocks, using mechanisms of horizontal and vertical cooperation, diversification of supply channels and building new technological and logistics chains. A significant role in this process was played by the state, which acts not only as a regulator, but also as an active participant in emerging ecosystems through programs of support, import substitution and technological subsidies. The scientific novelty of the work lies in a systematic approach to analyzing the dual effect of sanctions on the economy: on the one hand, sanctions restrict access to technology, capital and global markets, and on the other, they activate the processes of building closed corporate, sectoral and intersectoral ecosystems adapted to internal resources and alternative external relations. It is concluded that under the conditions of sanctions, the ecosystem model of development has shown high viability, especially in industries with a high concentration of capital, digitalization and government involvement. At the same time, key limitations have been identified: technological backwardness, staff shortages, reduced external financing, and risks of monopolization of the domestic market. The prospects for further research in this area are related to a quantitative assessment of the effectiveness of the ecosystem model in comparison with traditional forms of management, an analysis of new regional partnerships and institutional conditions for the formation of international ecosystem alliances.

About the Author

A. G. Glebova
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Anna G. Glebova — Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Assoc. Prof., Department of World Economy and Global Finance, Faculty of International Economic Cooperation

Moscow



References

1. Kochenov D, Evdokimov K. The impact of the 2022 sanctions on Russian scientific activity. Scientometrics. 2023. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-023-04769-4

2. Gaur A., Settles A., Väätänen J. Do economic sanctions work? Evidence from the Russia Ukraine conflict. J Manag Stud. 2023;60(6):1391–1414. DOI: 10.1111/joms.12933

3. Ryakhovskaya A. N. Current issues of implementing state economic policy at the present stage: Anti-crisis aspect. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo = Economics. Taxes. Law. 2024;17(1):106–118. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/1999-849X‑2024- 17-1-106-118

4. Sim L.C. The Arab Gulf States in the Asian energy market. Contemp Arab Aff. 2024;17(2):89–105. 5. Антропов В. В. Параллельный импорт в системе российской внешней торговли в 2025 году. Экономика. Налоги. Право. 2025;18(1):53–62. DOI: 10.26794/1999-849X‑2025-18-1-53-62 Antropov V. V. Parallel imports in the system of Russian foreign trade in 2025. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo = Economics. Taxes. Law. 2025;18(1):53–62. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/1999-849X‑2025-18-1-53-62

5. Tyryshkin N. R. Comparative analysis of corporate brand strategies of Russian machine-building companies (the case of Rostselmash, Chetra and UMG). Innovatsii i Investitsii = Innovations and Investments. 2024;(8):225–228. (In Russ.).

6. Panibratov A. Sanctions, cooperation, and innovation: Insights into Russian economy and implications for Russian firms. BRICS J Econ. 2021;2(3):4–26. DOI: 10.38050/2712-7508-2021-3-1

7. Glebova A. G. Financial and non-financial ecosystems: Global experience and Russian practice. Strakhovoe Pravo = Insurance Law. 2021;(4):93. (In Russ.).

8. Malkina M. Yu., Balakin R. V. Trends in the development of the Russian economy during the new anti-Russian sanctions. Russian Journal of Economics and Law. 2024;18(2):287–313. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.21202/2782–2923.2024.2.287–313

9. Aluyan S. V., Khoroshun K. V. Prospects for the development of business ecosystems under the Western sanctions policy. Ekonomika i Predprinimatelstvo = Journal of Economy and Entrepreneurship. 2023;(2):780–782. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.34925/EIP.2023.151.2.149

10. Medvedkina E. A., Sokolova I. I., Efremenko I. N. E-commerce market in global trade: Growth drivers, consolidation and regional development models. Rostov-on-Don: Donskoi gosudarstvennyi tekhnicheskii universitet = Don State Technical University; 2024. 188 p. (In Russ.).

11. Glebova A. G., Ivanovskaya Zh.V., Lukashenko I. V. Financial technologies in non-financial ecosystems: Global practice. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo = Economics. Taxes. Law. 2022;15(1):72–80. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/1999- 849X‑2022-15-1-72-80

12. Grishin D. L. Analysis of the state and development prospects of the venture capital market in the Russian Federation. Teoriya i Praktika Obshchestvennogo Razvitiya = Theory and Practice of Social Development. 2024;(10):164–169. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24158/tipor.2024.10.20

13. Moore J.F. Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harv Bus Rev. 1993;71(3):75–86. PMID: 10126156

14. Taleb N.N. Antifragile: Things that gain from disorder. New York: Random House; 2012.

15. Taleb N.N., Douady R. Mathematical definition, mapping, and detection of (anti)fragility. Quant Financ. 2013;13(11):1677–1689.

16. Zhu F., Cennamo C. Toward a better understanding of open ecosystems. Harvard Business School Working Paper; 2023.


Review

For citations:


Glebova A.G. Formation of Business Ecosystems in the Context of International Economic Constraints. Economics, taxes & law. 2025;18(6):33-41. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/1999-849X-2025-18-6-33-41

Views: 12


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1999-849X (Print)
ISSN 2619-1474 (Online)