Alternative Tax Dispute Resolution: Modern Approaches in the CIS and BRICS Countries
https://doi.org/10.26794/1999-849X-2025-18-4-164-171
Abstract
Tax disputes are an essential and important part of business activities and often shape law enforcement. The traditional methods of resolving a tax dispute in the Russian Federation are pre-trial (administrative) settlementat the level of a higher official or tax authority, or judicial (a tax dispute resolved in a court of established jurisdiction). At the same time, it is impossible to deny the importance of alternative dispute resolution methods, given that the main function of mediation is, in addition to protecting the rights and interests of the taxpayer, to find a compromise solution aimed at respecting both public and private interests in the current situation. The object of the research is modern models of alternative tax dispute resolution mechanisms that exist in the CIS, BRICS and other countries. The purpose of the work is to identify the most common and effective practices of alternative tax dispute resolution, as well as the possibility of using legal instruments of private (contractual) law in relations related to the collection of taxes and fees, including at the stage of out–of-court (pre-trial) appeal, that is, outside the framework of judicial procedure. The sources of information are the laws of the BRICS countries on mediation, government regulations, official information publicly available, and research by Russian experts in the field. The author analyzes the internal structure of the considered models, their organization and the legal status of the participating entities, as well as the possibility of applying the experience of foreign countries in the out-of-court settlement of tax disputes in the Russian Federation. The scientific novelty and relevance of the research lies in the author’s vision of a set of measures proposed in the article aimed at solving the task set by the President of the Russian Federation to reduce the burden on judicial authorities in the field of tax disputes. Based on the results of the study, it was concluded that reducing the burden on the courts can also be carried out through effective mutually consensual mediation procedures at the stage of administrative dispute resolution.
About the Author
R. V. YakushevRussian Federation
Roman V. Yakushev — Senior Lecturer at the Department of Public Law at the Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation, Head of the Department for Pre-Trial Settlement of Tax Disputes
Moscow
References
1. Arzumanova L.L. Alternative method of tax dispute resolution. Vestnik Universiteta imeni O. Ye. Kutafina (MGYUA) = Bulletin of the O.E. Kutafin University (MSAL). 2017; (8):66–75. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17803/2311–5998.2017.36.8.066–075
2. Arakelova M.V. Mediation as a method of tax dispute resolution. Finansovoye pravo = Financial law. 2015; (6): 29–34 (In Russ.).
3. Lisitsyn V.V. Mediation: conciliatory settlement of commercial disputes in Russia (past and present, foreign experience). Moscow: Radunitsa; 2010. 92–93 p. (In Russ.).
4. Mikhailova E.V. Procedural forms of protection of subjective civil rights, freedoms and legitimate interests in the Russian Federation (judicial and non-judicial). Monograph. Moscow: Prospect; 2017. 280 p. (In Russ.).
5. Reshetnikova I.V. Right of counter movement. Mediation and Russian arbitration process. Mediatsiya i pravo. Posrednichestvo i primireniye = Mediation and law. Mediation and reconciliation. 2007;2 (4): 53 (In Russ.).
6. Zaikin V.V., Dinaeva A.M. Settlement of tax disputes in Russian legislation and legislation of foreign countries. Liberal’no-demokraticheskiye tsennosti = Liberal democratic values. 2022.6(2):1–6. (In Russ.).
7. Gubarevich A.V. Potential possibility of applying the mediation procedure in tax relations in foreign economic activity. In: Actual problems of legal regulation of international relations. Collection of scientific articles. Vitebsk State University named after P.M. Masherov. 2019:116–122. (In Russ.).
8. Popov I.V. Explanations of tax legislation as a measure to prevent tax disputes. Vestnik Instituta zakonodatel’stva i pravovoy informatsii Respubliki Kazakhstan=Bulletin of the Institute of Legislation and Legal Information of the Republic of Kazakhstan. 2020; 59(1):362–367. (In Russ.).
9. Kurochkin D.A. Mediation in tax disputes: development prospects in Russia and other BRICS countries. Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal = Russian Law Journal. 2017;(50):189–204. (In Russ.).
10. Pasquale Pistone, Jan J.P. de Goede “Flexible Multi-Tier Dispute Resolution in International Tax Disputes”. IBFD; 2021. 580 p.
11. Yankevich S.V. The procedure for resolving tax disputes in the Republic of South Africa. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki = Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics. 2015;(4):174–185. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Yakushev R.V. Alternative Tax Dispute Resolution: Modern Approaches in the CIS and BRICS Countries. Economics, taxes & law. 2025;18(4):164-171. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/1999-849X-2025-18-4-164-171