Approaches to the Definition of “Smart Territories” as Guidelines for the Strategic Development of Municipalities

The subject of the study is “smart territories” as elements of a spatial ecosystem. The purpose of the work is to study “smart territories” as guidelines for the strategic development of municipalities, identify related problems and develop appropriate proposals for improvement. Based on the analysis of the works of Russian and foreign scientists on the definition of a “smart territory”, it is proved that it is an autonomous spatial ecosystem that exists in a single communication space with spatial ecosystems of other levels and can act as a recipient and donor of a “smart good” at the same time. It is concluded that the “smart” territory (“smart municipality”) — this is a public space, which is an administrative-territorial entity, which is managed (at the appropriate level) through information and communication and “end-to-end” technologies, and information systems (public and non-public platforms) operating on their basis, with the participation of entities (external and internal) included in the “smart network”, targeted interaction which are aimed at improving the quality of life of the population, business conditions in order to maintain balance, as well as accumulation, in the future, the useful use and reproduction of human, social, entrepreneurial, infrastructural. In addition, depending on the degree of involvement of smart solutions (technologies) in the system of public and public administration of the “smart territory”, as well as the overall functioning of its institutions and non-institutional entities, it is possible to determine the level of its “intelligence” (its evolution: “Smart Cities 1.0”, “Smart Cities 2.0”). The obtained research results make it possible to adapt new approaches to “smart territories” as possible reference points for the strategic development of municipalities. 

1. Nikitaeva A. Yu., Chernova O.A., Molapisi L. Smart territories as a driver for the transition to sustainable regional development and green economy. R-economy. 2022;8(2):120–134.

2. Lyshchikova Yu.V. The concept of “smart region”: Methodology and tools. In: Spatial development of territories: Coll. scientific. works of the IV Int. scientific-practical. conf., Belgorod, November 25, 2021. Belgorod: 2021:46–51. (In Russ.).

3. Garifullina A.F., Kraynova E.N. “Smart” cities as a factor of economic growth: Systems analysis and development prospects. Vestnik universiteta = Bulletin of the University. 2024;(12):38–49. (In Russ.).

4. Nikitaeva A.Yu.Smart cities and smart territories. Rostov-on-Don: Southern Federal University; 2024.166 p. (In Russ.).

5. Amorim J.A., de Siqueira Rocha J.-M., Magal-Royo T. Cybersecurity in Europe: Digital identifi cation, authentication, and trust services. Handbook of research on advancing cybersecurity for digital transformation. IGI-GLOBAL; 2021:18–36.

6. Zolotykh Z.A., Boretsky D.S. Smart city as a way of organizing the urban environment. Tendencii razvitiya nauki i obrazovaniya = Trends in the development of science and education. 2024;105(13):15–18. (In Russ.).

7. Picon A. Smart cities: A spatialized intelligence. West Sussex: John Wiley; 2015. 176 p.

8. Nesti G. Defining and assessing the transformational nature of smart city governance: In-sights from four European cases. International Review of Administrative Sciences. 2020;(1):20–37.

9. Zotov V.B. Modern digital technologies in the management of a megalopolis (the “Smart City Moscow” program). Informacionnye i telekommunikacionnye tekhnologii = Information and telecommunication technologies. 2021;(49):20–24. (In Russ.).

10. Fomin R.V. “Smart city” as a progressive form of spatial-economic transformation in the region: Concept, tools, efficiency: diss. … Cand. of Economics: 08.00.05. Belgorod; 2021. 185 p. (In Russ.).

11. Ben Letaifa S. How to strategize smart cities: Revealing the smart model. Journal of Business Research. 2015;68(7):1414–1419.

12. Cagica Carvalho L. Entrepreneurial ecosystems: Lisbon as a smart start-up city. Handbook of research on entrepreneurial development and innovation within smart cities. IGI-GLOBAL; 2017:1–19.

13. Sukharev O.S. Smart city and territory: bridging the structural gap. Vestnik Instituta ehkonomiki Rossijskoj akademii nauk = Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2022;(1):68–84. (In Russ.).

14. Barba-Sánchez V., Arias-Antúnez E., Orozco-Barbosa L., Hollands R.G. Critical interventions into the corporate smart city. Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society. 2015;8(1):61–77.

15. Frank E., Aznar Fernández-Montesinos G. Smart city = Smart citizen = Smart economy? An economic perspective of smart cities. Social, legal, and ethical implications of IoT, cloud, and edge computing technologies. IGI-GLOBAL; 2020:161–180.

16. Barbosa A.C., Oliveira T.A., Coelho, V.N. Cryptocurrencies for smart territories: An exploratory study. International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN). 2018:1–8.

17. Aleksejeva L., Šipilova V., Jermolajeva E., et al. Regional risks and challenges in smart growth in Latgale region (Latvia). Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues. 2018;7:727–739.

18. Gil-Garcia J.R., Pardo T.A., Nam T. What makes a city smart? Identifying core components and proposing an integrative and comprehensive conceptualization. Information Polity. 2015;20:61–87.

19. Cho J.Y., Park S.K. Key factors for sustainable operation of smart rural communities in aging societies: Voices of Korean community leaders. Technol. Soc. 2023;74:102306.