Mechanism for Assessing the Commercial Relevance of Intellectual Results of University Science in the Context of a New Socio-Economic Agenda

Within the framework of the formed socio-economic agenda, which puts forward as tasks the acceleration of technical and technological development of the branches of the Russian Federation, the introduction of digitalization in all spheres of society, the involvement of university researchers in the implementation of projects most in demand by industrial enterprises. This requires the concentration of the entire intellectual potential and experience of the teaching staff and graduate students, the use of all types of laboratory equipment to solve scientific and practical problems of strategic or commercial value. The subject of the research is the creation of a digital mechanism for assessing the relevance of research projects (R&D) for subsequent selection and inclusion in the plans of scientific activities of universities. The purpose of the work is to provide the most objective assessment of the relevance of research based on the synthesis of expert evaluation criteria, weight evaluation of the direction of research and mathematical processing of multi — criteria evaluation of research projects to determine their priority. Разработана шкала для проведения экспертного анализа проектов НИР с помощью лексических оценок и их перевода в интервальную оценку. An algorithm of multi-criteria ranking of projects has been formed, which provides an opportunity to identify projects that have the highest commercial demand or strategic value.

1. Pipiya L. K., Dorogokupets V. S. On the issue of evaluating the results of scientific activity. Innovatsii = Innovations. 2017;219(1):39–45. (In Russ.).

2. Shepelev G. V. Science and economy interrelation. Upravleniye naukoy: teoriya i praktika = Science Management: Theory and Practic., 2020:2(3):70–90. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.19181/smtp.2020.2.3.4

3. Shepelev G. V. On the evaluation of the effectiveness of scientific research. Upravleniye naukoy: teoriya i praktika = Science Management: Theory and Practice. 2021;3(4):123–145. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.19181/smtp.2021.3.4.15

4. Vyunov S. S., Klypin, A. V. Towards the issue about evaluation of demand for R&D results by the real economy and social sphere. Upravleniye naukoy: teoriya i praktika = Science Management: Theory and Practice. 2022;4(1):122–142. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.19181/smtp.2022.4.1.7

5. Pronichkin S. V., Tikhonov I. P. Evaluation of the performance of scientific organizations. Ekonomicheskiy analiz: teoriya i praktika = Economic analysis: theory and practice. 2014;354(3):27–32. (In Russ.).

6. Livshits V. N., Panov A. S., Tishchenko T. I. and others. Correct assessment of the effectiveness of investment projects is the key to the success of modernization. Analiz i modelirovaniye ekonomicheskikh i sotsial’nykh protsessov: matematika. komp’yuter = Analysis and modeling of economic and social processes: mathematics. computer. Education. 2015;(3):7–24. (In Russ.).

7. Bukach B. A., Mitus K. N., Pisyaryuk S. N., Drebot A. M. Algorithm for ranking research projects and developments of the university depending on the level of their commercial potential. Voprosy innovatsionnoy ekonomiki = Questions of innovative economy. 2021;11(4):1627–1642. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18334/vinec.11.4.113815

8. Mitus K. N., Katsko I. A. Choosing the best methods for evaluating the effectiveness of information technology using the Kemeny median. Politematicheskiy setevoy elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta = Polythematic network electronic scientific journal of the Kuban State Agrarian University. 2015;110:773–785. (In Russ.).

9. Shvetsova O. A., Rodionova E. A., Epstein M. Z. Evaluation of investment projects under uncertainty: multicriteria approach using interval data. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues. 2018;5(4):914–928. DOI: 10.9770/jesi.2018.5.4(15)

10. Franck Marle, Thierry Gidel. A multi-criteria decision-making process for project risk management method selection. International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making? 2012;2(2):189–223. DOI: 10.1504/IJMCDM.2012.046948

11. Julio González-Díaz, Ruud Hendrickx, Edwin Lohmann. Paired comparisons analysis: an axiomatic approach to ranking methods. Social Choice and Welfare. 2014;42(1):139–169. DOI: 10.1007/s00355–013–0726–2

12. Novoselov A. L., Novoselova I. Yu. Improving the mechanism for selecting a production facility for hydrocarbon raw materials. Mineral’nyye resursy Rossii. Ekonomika i upravleniye = Mineral resources of Russia. Economics and Management. 2022;176(1):30–34. (In Russ.).

13. Yang H. X., Yin J. J., Wang, A. L. An evaluation model of graduation thesis results based on triangular fuzzy number. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics. 2022;(10):1642–1650. DOI: 10.4236/jamp.2022.105114

14. Vodopyanova T. P., Zhukoven V. S. Method of analysis of hierarchies as a tool for managing the risks of innovative activity of an enterprise. Trudy BGTU. Ser. 6, Istoriya, filosofiyaProceedings of BSTU Ser.6, History, philosophy. 2021;245(1):181–185. (In Russ.).

15. Volokobinsky M. Yu., Pekarskaya O. A., Razi D. A. Decision making based on the method of analysis of hierarchies. Finansy: teoriya i praktika = Finance: theory and practice. 2016;20(2):33–42. (In Russ.).

16. Michael Gr. Voskoglou Use of the triangular fuzzy numbers for student assessment. American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics. 2015; 3(4):146–150. DOI: 10.12691/ajams-3–4–2

17. Mindeli L. E., Ostapyuk S. F. Methodology for choosing the priorities of fundamental science. ETAP: ekonomicheskaya teoriya, analiz, praktika= STAGE: economic theory, analysis, practice. 2018;(1):127–143. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24411/2071–6435–2018–10010