Preview

Economics, taxes & law

Advanced search

An Economic and Analytical Approach to Assessing the Tax Risks of the Absence of an Actual Right to Income

https://doi.org/10.26794/1999-849X-2023-16-3-128-137

Abstract

The subject of the study is the identification by the tax authorities of the dependence of the jurisdiction of the location of the parent companies of Russian organizations on the amount of additional charges for corporate income tax withheld at source in Russia, while controlling the actual right to income (FPA) of a foreign organization. The purpose of the work is to develop proposals for tax risk management in determining the FPA. The article, in conjunction with the analysis of the dynamics of foreign direct investment from Russia, analyzes information on changes in the amounts of corporate income tax paid when paying passive income to foreign recipients, as well as data on the amount of additional tax when monitoring the status of the FPA. As a result of the analysis of court decisions on the basis of the «geography» of the beneficial owners of income from the Russian source, the relationship between the jurisdiction of registration of parent companies of taxpayers and the average amount of additional corporate income tax due to non-compliance with the status of the FPA was established. It is concluded that in the overwhelming majority of tax disputes on the status of the FPA, foreign companies — recipients of income were recognized by the courts as conduit companies created to take advantage of registration in low-tax jurisdictions and abuse the provisions of international tax treaties. It was revealed that over the past seven years, the reason for the outflow of capital from the country was the desire of taxpayers to reduce the effective tax rate by withdrawing profits to low-tax jurisdictions, in which large firms prefer Singapore for structuring cash flows in most cases.

About the Authors

L. V. Polezharova
Financial University
Russian Federation

Ludmila V. Polezharova — Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Assoc. Prof.; Department of Taxes and Tax Administration, Financial University, Advisor to the State Civil Service of the Russian Federation, 1st Class, Honorary Employee of the Ministry of Taxes and Duties of the Russian Federation, member of the International Tax Association IFA.

Moscow



S. B. Razu
Financial University
Russian Federation

Semen B. Razu — tax consultant of the international consulting group LLC “Technologies of Trust – Consulting”.

Moscow



References

1. Cervantes M. Interpreting the concept of beneficial ownership. Toronto: University of Toronto; 2009. 58 p.

2. Mithe A. Critical analysis of the principal purpose test and the limitation on benefits rule: a world divided but it takes two to tango. IBFD International Tax studies. World Tax Journal. 2020;12(1). URL: https://www.ibfd.org/shop/journal/critical-analysis-principal-purpose-test-and-limitation-benefits-rule-world-divided-it.

3. Guznova E.A. The development of the concept of beneficial owner in the tax law of the Russian Federation. Aktualnye problemy rossiyskogo prava = Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2019;(3):82–87. (In Russ.).

4. Kryzhanovskaya Е. The beneficial owner concept in civil law countries of Sweden and Denmark. Lap Lambert Academic Publishing; 2015. 60 p. URL: https://www.perlego.com/book/3429177/beneficial-owner-concept-in-civil-law-countries-of-sweden-and-denmark-pdf.

5. Vogel Klaus. Double taxation conventions, third edition. a commentary to the OECD, UN and U. S. Model conventions for the avoidance of double taxation of income and capital, with particular reference to German Treaty Practice. Тhe Netherlands: Kluwer Law International; 1997. 1688 р.

6. Polezharova L.V. Methodology of taxation and tax administration of transnational companies and beneficiaries. Moscow: KNORUS; 2022. 400 p. (In Russ.).

7. Goncharenko L.I., Advocatova A.S., Alekseevich B.A. identification of the obligation to fix calculations in the system of tax relations. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo. = Economics, taxes & law. 2022;15(2):156–166. (In Russ.).

8. Davnis V.V., Tinyakova V.I. Fundamentals of econometric modeling. Voronezh: AONO “IMMiF”; 2003. 155 р. (In Russ.).

9. Akhmetshin R.I. Beneficial ownership of income: last year’s lessons. Nalogoved = Tax specialist. 2022;(3):24–34. (In Russ.).

10. Zakharenkova E.V. Development trends of the concept of actual income right in the russian judicial practice. Nalogi = Taxes. 2020;(1):38–41. (In Russ.).

11. Kosenkova Yu., Chernov S., Shestak V. Modern tax havens: the experience of european countries. Montenegrin Journal of Economics. 2022;18(4):61–70.

12. Polezharova L.V., Razu S.B. Еlimination of economic double taxation of dividends. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo. = Economics, taxes & law. 2022;15(2):146–155. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Polezharova L.V., Razu S.B. An Economic and Analytical Approach to Assessing the Tax Risks of the Absence of an Actual Right to Income. Economics, taxes & law. 2023;16(3):128-137. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/1999-849X-2023-16-3-128-137

Views: 20


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1999-849X (Print)
ISSN 2619-1474 (Online)