Preview

Economics, taxes & law

Advanced search

The Fourth Energy Transition — Barriers and Ways to Overcome

https://doi.org/10.26794/1999-849X-2023-16-3-35-45

Abstract

The relevance of the study is due to the influence of the fourth energy transition on the amount of income of the Russian budget system, as well as on the amount of income of Russian gas and oil producers, whose activities directly affect the development of a number of regions of Russia. The subject of the study is the process of the fourth energy transition of the EU economies. The objectives of the work are to define the concept of “energy transition”, identify the prerequisites for the fourth energy transition, consider the main barriers that have slowed down the fourth energy transition in the EU, and the formed ways to overcome these barriers. As a result of the study, a compromise definition of the energy transition between the approaches of V. Smil and Zh-B. was formulated. Espresso as an extremely time-stretched process of “creeping” replacement of energy sources. The reasons for the imbalance of the EU energy system as the main barrier to the fourth energy transition are revealed. Emphasis is placed on the role of the principles of sustainable development in the process of excessive acceleration of the fourth energy transition of the EU economies, as well as on the importance of weather factors in determining the fallacy of this decision. The role of Russia in ensuring an accelerated painless transition of European countries to green energy generation sources has been established. The two-stage EU plan for the implementation of the fourth energy transition in the context of sanctions pressure on Russia is described. Conclusions are drawn that against the background of the ongoing fourth energy transition of Russia, it is necessary to increase domestic consumption of hydrocarbons as a result of the development of the national economy, as well as to increase cooperation with the countries of the East.

About the Author

V. V. Eremin
Financial University
Russian Federation

Vladimir V. Eremin — Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Leading Researcher at the Center for Monitoring and Evaluation of Economic Security of the Institute of Economic Policy and Economic Security Problems of the Faculty of Economics and Business, Financial University.

Moscow



References

1. Smil V. Energy transitions. history, requirements, prospects. Westport: Praeger; 2010. 178 p.

2. Shove E., Walker G. Transitions ahead: politics, practice, and sustainable transition management. Environment and Planning A. 2007;39:763–770. DOI: 10.1068/a39310

3. O’Connor P.A. Energy transitions. The Pardee Papers. No. 12. Boston: Boston University, The Frederick S. Pardee. Center for the Study of the Longer-Range Future; 2010. 50 p.

4. Mumford L. Technics and civilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2010. 528 p.

5. Fressoz J.-B. Pour une histoire désorientée de l’énergie. 25èmes Journées Scientifiques de l’Environnement. L’économie verte en question. Créteil, France. Hal-00956441; 2014. 12 p.

6. Debeir J.C., Deléage J.P., Hémery D. In the servitude of power: energy and civilisation through the ages. London: Bloomsbury Academic; 1991. 286 p.

7. Fouquet R., Pearson P. J.G. A thousand years of energy use in the United Kingdom. The Energy Journal. 1998;19(4):1–41. DOI: 10.5547/issn0195–6574-ej-vol19-no4–1

8. Fouquet R. Historical energy transitions: speed, prices and system transformation. Energy Research & Social Science. 2016;22:7–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2016.08.014

9. Gales B., Kander A., Malanima P., Rubio M.d.M. North vs south: energy transition and energy intensity in europe over 200 years. European Review of Economic History. 2007;11(2):219–53. DOI: 10.1017/s1361491607001967

10. Arrhenius S. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground. Philosophical Magazine and Journal Science (Fifth Series). 1896;41:237–276.

11. Walter M.E. Earthquakes and weatherquakes: mathematics and climate change. Notices of the American Mathematical Society. 2010;57(10):1278–1284.

12. Kodaneva S. I. Green Investments in Russia and abroad: problems, mechanisms and prospects. Rossiya i sovremenny`j mir = Russia and the modern hedgehog world. 2020;108(3):68–88. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31249/rsm/2020.03.05

13. Kemp-Benedict E. Investing in a green transition. Ecological Economics. 2018;153:218–236. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.07.012

14. Doustimotlagh N., Mirzaee S. Increasing CO2 in atmosphere cannot increase the Earth’s temperature. World Conference on Climate change. At: Valencia, Spain; 2016. 12 p.

15. Leplinskiy Yu.I. The use of environmental mythologies in order to legitimize the globalization. Evrazijskaja integracija: jekonomika, pravo, politika = Eurasian integration: economics, law, politics. 2018;25(3):36–44. (In Russ.).

16. Goldthau A., Tagliapietra S. Energy crisis: five questions that must be answered in 2023. Nature. 2022;612(7941):627–630. DOI: 10.1038/d41586–022–04467-w

17. Semikashev V.V., Gayvoronskaya M.S. Analysis of the State and Development Prospects of the Russian Gas Industry before and after 2022. Nauchnye trudy: Institut narodnohozjajstvennogo prognozirovanija RAN = Scientific works: Institute of Economic Forecasting of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2022:108–127. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.47711/2076–318–2022–108–127


Review

For citations:


Eremin V.V. The Fourth Energy Transition — Barriers and Ways to Overcome. Economics, taxes & law. 2023;16(3):35-45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/1999-849X-2023-16-3-35-45

Views: 29


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1999-849X (Print)
ISSN 2619-1474 (Online)