Alternative Methods of Economic Assessment of Environmental Pollution by Energy Facilities
https://doi.org/10.26794/1999-849X-2025-18-2-67-76
Abstract
The subject of the study is energy facilities, which are among the largest pollutants of atmospheric air due to the growth of housing construction and increased traffic load on the urban street and road network. In turn, the correct assessment of environmental pollution currently and in the future depends on decision-making on the technical renovation of energy facilities. The purpose of the work is to establish alternative methods for the economic assessment of environmental pollution from the activities of energy facilities and alternative tools for protecting the biosphere, which prevents harm (damage) to living organisms from emissions of harmful substances. The article considers indicators that allow comprehensively characterizing the environmental situation in the region, including the regional index of anthropogenic transformation; anthropogenic pressure coefficient; level of environmental tension; ergodemographic index; coefficient of natural protection. The options for the economic assessment of damage from atmospheric air pollution are given. The result of the work was the development of proposals to improve existing methods of economic assessment of environmental harm (damage) from emissions of harmful substances due to the mandatory inclusion in the calculation of a coefficient that takes into account regional characteristics and population density. It is concluded that the procedure proposed in the article for assessing the damage caused to the environment by emissions of harmful substances can be applied at the forecasting stage during the period of immutability of technological processes occurring at energy facilities.
About the Authors
I. Yu. Novoselova
Financial University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Irina Yu. Novoselova — Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Prof. of Department of Industry, Markets, Faculty of Economics and Business
A. l. Novoselov
Gubkin Russian State University of Oil and Gas
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Andrey L. Novoselov — Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Prof. of Department of Economics of the Oil and Gas Industry
References
1. Novoselov A., Potravny I., Novoselova I. Yu. et al. Harmonization of interests during Arctic industrial development: The case of mining corporation and indigenous peoples in Russia. Polar Science. 2023;35:100915. DOI: 10.1016/j.polar.2022.100915
2. Elena Z.A Business management model in the circular economy: Technological solutions for plastic recycling. Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental. 2024;18(10):109398. DOI: 10.24857/rgsa.v18n10–275
3. Dmitrieva D. Russian arctic mineral resources sustainable development in the context of energy transition, ESG Agenda and Geopolitical Tensions. Energies. 2023;16(13):5145. DOI: 10.3390/en16135145
4. Makarova I., Makarov D., Gubacheva L. et al. Assessment of Environmental risks during the implementation of infrastructure projects in the arctic region. Infrastructures. 2024;9(9):148. DOI: 10.3390/infrastructures9090148
5. Shinkevich A. I. Development of a methodology for forecasting the sustainable development of industry in Russia based on the tools of factor and discriminant analysis. Mathematics. 2022;10(6). DOI: 10.3390/math10060859
6. X. Xu, Zh. Zhu, L. Ye et al. Ultimate pit limit optimization method with integrated consideration of ecological cost, slope safety and benefits: A case study of heishan open pit coal mine. Sustainability. 2024.16(13):5393. DOI: 10.3390/su16135393
7. Waldhoff S, Anthoff D, Rose S. The marginal damage costs of different greenhouse gases: An application of FUND. Economics. 2014(8):13. DOI: 10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2014–316
8. Новоселова И. Ю. Социо-эколого-экономический выбор маршрута нефтепровода. Проблемы региональной экологии. 2024;(5):85–90. DOI: 10.24412/1728–323X-2024–5–85–89 Novoselova I. Yu. Socio-ecological-economic choice of the oil pipeline route. Problemy regional’noy ekologii = The problems of regional ecology. 2024;(5):85–90. (In Russ). DOI: 10.24412/1728–323X-2024–5–85–89
9. Трапезникова И. С. Экономическая оценка комплексного ущерба от деятельности предприятий добывающей промышленности с учетом экологического фактора. Экономика и управление: проблемы, решения.2022;122(3):10–14. DOI: 10.36871/ek.up.p.r.2022.02.03.002 Trapeznikova I. S. Economic assessment of complex damage from the activities of enterprises of the extractive industry taking into account the environmental factor. Ekonomika i upravleniye: problemy, resheniya = Economy and management: problems, solutions. 2022;122(3):10–14. (In Russ). DOI: 10.36871/ek.up.p.r.2022.02.03.002
10. Медведева О. Е., Артеменков А. И. Оценка ущерба от загрязнения атмосферного воздуха в России. Современные подходы и методика. Имущественные отношения в РФ. 2019;215(8):31–42. DOI: 10.24411/2072–4098–2019–10802 Medvedeva O. E., Artemenkov A. I. Assessment of damage from air pollution in Russia. Modern approaches and methods. Imushchestvennyye otnosheniya v RF = Property relations in the Russian Federation. 2019;215(8):31–42. (In Russ). DOI: 10.24411/2072–4098–2019–10802
11. Соловьева С. В., Фильченкова О.А., Медведева О. Е. Оценка ущерба (вреда) от загрязнения атмосферного воздуха для стимулирования внедрения наилучших доступных технологий в России. Имущественные отношения в РФ. 2019;216(9):35–45. DOI: 10.24411/2072–4098–2019–10902 Solovieva S.V., Filchenkova O.A., Medvedeva O. E. Assessment of damage (harm) from air pollution to stimulate the implementation of the best available technologies in Russia. Imushchestvennyye otnosheniya v RF = Property relations in the Russian Federation. 2019;216(9):35–45. (In Russ). DOI: 10.24411/2072–4098–2019–10902
12. Артамонов Г. Е., Васенев И. И., Гутников В. А. Экологическая оценка углеродного и азотного следа объектов тепловой энергетики в условиях города Москвы. Экология урбанизированных территорий. 2023;(4):16–25. DOI: 10.24412/1816–1863–2023–4–16–25 Artamonov G. E., Vasenev I. I., Gutnikov V. A. Ecological assessment of the carbon and nitrogen footprint of thermal power plants in the conditions of Moscow. Ekologiya urbanizirovannykh territoriy = Ecology of urbanized territories. 2023;(4):16–25. (In Russ). DOI: 10.24412/1816–1863–2023–4–16–25
13. Afanasieva O. R., Adamenko A. P., Shumakov S. A., Zarapina L. V., Mukhlynina M. M. Economic and legal aspects of compensation for environmental damage. Journal of Environmental and Tourism. 2020;11:43. DOI: 10.14505//jemt.v11.3(43).03
14. Росляков П. В., Рыбаков Б. А., Савитенко М. Оценки возможностей снижения выбросов парниковых газов при сжигании топлив в котлах ТЭС и котельных. Теплоэнергетика. 2022;(9):97–106. DOI: 10.56304/S0040363622090041 Roslyakov P. V., Rybakov B. A., Savitenko M. Assessment of the possibilities of reducing greenhouse gas emissions during combustion of fuels in boilers of thermal power plants and boiler houses. Teploenergetika = Thermal Power Engineering. 2022;(9):97–106. (In Russ). DOI: 10.56304/S0040363622090041
15. Сибгатуллин А., Ишков А., Петличенко К. Оценка потенциала снижения выбросов парниковых газов с учетом перспектив развития газификации регионов России. Энергетическая политика.2023;189(10):31–42. DOI: 10.46920/2409–5516_2023_10189_30 Sibgatullin A. Ishkov, K. Petlichenko. Assessment of the potential for reducing greenhouse gas emissions, taking into account the prospects for the development of gasification of Russian regions. Energeticheskaya politika = Energy Policy. 2023;189(10):31–42. (In Russ). DOI: 10.46920/2409–5516_2023_10189_30
Review
For citations:
Novoselova I.Yu., Novoselov A.l. Alternative Methods of Economic Assessment of Environmental Pollution by Energy Facilities. Economics, taxes & law. 2025;18(2):67-76. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/1999-849X-2025-18-2-67-76
Views:
45
Email this article 