Greening of Industrialization as a New Stage in the Development of the Global Economy
https://doi.org/10.26794/1999-849X-2025-18-2-19-30
Abstract
The subject of the research is the evolution of the global economy from post–industrialization to a new industrial policy. The purpose of the work is to substantiate the evolutionary transition of the modern world economy to reindustrialization as a new industrial policy of states, but taking into account the environmental safety of society and the environment. The tendency of individual states to restore the policy of realizing national interests by rejecting their replacement with pan-European values and switching to supporting vulnerable segments of the population and ensuring social equality in solving the problems of eliminating imbalances in the development of territories and regions has been established. The article analyzes the evolution of the global economy from post-industrialization to a new industrial policy. It is determined that in the process of developing national economies, due to participation in global value chains, states have faced a number of problems, including monospecialization, unfair profit distribution, and the inability to saturate the technological level of socio-economic development of the main areas of the country. Accordingly, the leadership of these States hascome to realize that a real industrial transformation cannot occur without a new industrial policy aimed at increasing domestic production potential. The assumption is substantiated that the competitive advantage in the third decade of the 21st century. those countries that more quickly recognize the need to restore the regulatory role of the state, as well as the fact that the policy of new reindustrialization will be greened, consistent with the determinants of environmental protection based on increased productivity of resource use and minimizing the negative impact of industrial enterprises on the environment. It is concluded that the new industrial policy is essentially reindustrialization, taking into account the economic, social and environmental results of the activities of states.
Supporting agencies: The article was prepared based on the results of research carried out at the expense of budgetary funds on a state assignment to a Financial University
About the Author
V. V. Perskaya
Financial University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Victoria V. Perskaya — Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Prof., Director of the Institute for International Economic Relations Research, Prof. of the Department of World Economy and World Finance, Honored Economist of Russia
References
1. Simon Evenett, Adam Jakubik, Fernando Martín, Michele Ruta. The return of industrial policy in data. URL https://web.archive.org/web/20240111152806/https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/return-industrial-policy-data11
2. Aiyar S, Presbitero A. and Ruta M. Geoeconomic fragmentation: The economic risks from a fractured world economy. CEPR Press; 2023.
3. Hoekman B, Mavroidis P. C., Nelson D. R. Non-economic objectives, globalisation and multilateral trade cooperation. CEPR Press; 2023.
4. Erkman S. Industrial ecology: an historical view. Journal of Cleaner Produc-tion. 1997;5(1–2):1–10.
5. Graedel Thomas E., Eckelman Matthew J. Industrial ecology and sustainability. DOI: 10.1142/13447
6. Xiaozhen Xu., Xiaozhen Xu., Gang Liu. Modernizing cement manufacturing in China leads to substantial environmental gains. Communications Earth & Environment. 2022;3(1):276. DOI: 10.1038/s43247-022-00579-3
7. Shekhar Aiyar, Jiaqian Chen, Christian H. Ebeke, Roberto Garcia-Saltos et al. Geoeconomic fragmentation and the future of multilateralism. Staff Discussion Notes. January 15, 2023.
8. Kling Arnold. The post-industrial state. National affairs. 2022;(53). URL: https://www.nationalaffairs.com.
9. Sun Y., Zhu S., Wang D. et al. Global supply chains amplify economic costs of future extreme heat risk. Nature. 2024;627:797–804. DOI: 10.1038/s41586–024–07147-z
10. Ha-Joon Chang, Andreoni Antonio. Bringing production back into development: an introduction. The Europe an Journal of Development Research. 2021;33:165–178. DOI: 10.1057/s41287–021–00359–3
11. Robbins L. An essay on the nature and significance of economic science. London: MacMillan and Co. Macmillan and co., limited st. martin’s street, London; 1945, p. 16.
12. Pranav Gavali. Ranked: The world’s 50 top countries by GDP. 2023. URL: https://www.visualcapitalist.com/cp/gdp-by-country-sector-breakdown.
13. Chang HJ., Andreoni A. Bringing production back into development: An introduction. Eur J Dev Res 33: 165–178. 2021. DOI: 10.1057/s41287-021-00359-3
14. Lee K. Schumpeterian analysis of economic catch-up. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781107337244
15. Hallegatte S., Rogelj J., Allen M. et al. 2016. Mapping the climate change challenge. Nature Climate Change. 2016;(6):663–668.
16. Fuso Nerini F., Andreoni A., Bauner D., and Howells M. Powering production: The case of the sisal fibre production in the Tanga region, Tanzania. Energy Policy. 2016;(98):544–556.
17. Galbraith J. Inequality and instability. A study of the world economy just before the great crisis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.; 2012.
18. Bezat Jean-Michel. Reindustrialization: “Whether they admit it or not, European leaders defend national interests first”. URL: https://www.lemonde.fr/en/opinion/article/2023/05/16/reindustrialization-whether-they-admit-it-or-not-european-leaders-defend-national-interests-first_6026796_23.html.
19. Eichengreen Barry. The new industrial politics. Oct 9, 2023. URL: https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/return-of-industrial-policy-only-partly-vindicated-by-barry-eichengreen-2023–10.
20. Перская В. В., Морковкин Д. Е., Чупин А. Л., Хомякова Л. И., Басова М. М. Концептуальные основы развития теории ESG применительно к российскому бизнесу. Вопросы истории. 2022;(9–1):256–270. Perskaya V. V., Morkovkin D. E., Chupin A. L., Khomyakova L. I., Basova M. M. Conceptual framework for the development of theory in relation to Russian business. Voprosy istorii = History issues. 2022;(9–1):256–270. (In Russ.).
21. Kastelli Ioanna, Mamica Lukasz, Lee Keun. New perspectives and issues in industrial policy for sustainable development: From developmental and entrepreneurial to environmental state. Rev Evol Polit Econ . 2023;(4):1–25. DOI: 10.1007/s43253-023-00100-2
22. Johnson C. MITI and the Japanese miracle: The growth of industrial policy, 1925–1975. Chalmers Johnson. Stanford University Press, Stanford, Calif; 1982.
23. Thurbon E., Kim S.Y., Tan H., Mathews J. Developmental environmentalism: State ambition and creative destruction in East Asia’s green energy shift. Oxford University Press, Oxford; 2023. 24. Aiginger K, Rodrik D. Rebirth of industrial policy and an agenda for the twenty-first century. J Ind CompetTrade. 2020;20.
Review
For citations:
Perskaya V.V. Greening of Industrialization as a New Stage in the Development of the Global Economy. Economics, taxes & law. 2025;18(2):19-30. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/1999-849X-2025-18-2-19-30
Views:
45
Email this article 