Project Approach 2023: The Need to Use Integral Control Indicators
https://doi.org/10.26794/1999-849X-2023-16-1-99-107
Abstract
The relevance of the study is due to the complexity of the implementation of state project management in conditions of lack of resources due to sanctions imposed by Western countries on the import of goods and services to the Russian Federation. The subject of the study is integral indicators in the control system of the project approach to ensuring national security. The purpose of the work is to create a methodology for calculating integral indicators to assess the state of national security. As a result of the study, a classification of integral and partial control indicators was formed; the reasons for the low efficiency of using strictly formalized mathematical methods for the formation of integral indicators in project management were identified, which necessitate the establishment of expert methods for determining the weights of particular indicators for their further linear convolution into integral indicators; an approach to expert formation of weights of particular indicators that reduce the influence of subjective expert opinions. Conclusions are drawn that the use of integral indicators of project management control allows organizations to form a more flexible system of control over the implementation of project management in the areas of national security and socio-economic development of the country.
Keywords
strategic planning,
strategic management,
crisis management,
integral indicators,
state control,
national security,
project management
Supporting agencies: The article was prepared based on the results of research carried out at the expense of budgetary funds under the state assignment to the Financial University.
About the Author
V. V. Eremin
Financial University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladimir V. Eremin — C and. Sci. (Econ.), Leading Researcher of the Center for Monitoring and Evaluation of Economic Security of the Institute of Economic Policy and Economic Security Problems of the Department of Economic Security and Risk Management of the Faculty of Economics and Business,
Moscow.
References
1. Vasilyev A. I., Prokofyev S. Y. Project management organisation in public authorities. Upravlencheskie nauki = Management Sciences. 2016;4:44–52. (In Russ.).
2. Nikolaev A. A., Dunaeva A. I., Udachin N. O. Sociological approach to the problems and the prospects of the project management in the Russian Federation. Internet‑zhurnal «Naukovedenie» = Internet journal «Science». 2014. URL: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sovershenstvovanie-protsessov-proektnogo-upravleniya-v-rossiyskoy-federatsii. (In Russ.).
3. Yanovskiy V. V., Isaev A. P., Nescheret A. K. About the project approach implementation in public administration and local self-government. Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie = Administrative Consulting. 2018;7:8–16. (In Russ.).
4. Podkolzin A. V. Features of the implementation of the project management system in federal executive authorities. Jekonomika i upravlenie: problemy, reshenija = Economics and management: problems, solutions. 2022;121(1):113–118. (In Russ.).
5. Isakov N. A. Adaptive project management: essence, goals, principles. Finansovyj biznes = Financial business. 2022;223(10):114–117. (In Russ.).
6. Osipova U. A., Lavrov D. N. Application of cluster analysis by the k-means method for the classification of scientific texts. Matematicheskie struktury i modelirovanie = Mathematical Structures and Modeling. 2017;43(3):108–121. (In Russ.).
7. Kini R. L., Raifa. Decision making under multiple criteria: preferences and substitutions. Moscow: Radio and communications; 1981. 560 p. (In Russ.).
8. Novikova N. M., Pospelova I. I. The use of linear scalarization in multicriteria maximin problems. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Serija 15: Vychislitel’naja matematika i kibernetika = Bulletin of Moscow University. Episode 15: Computational Mathematics and Cybernetics. 2021;2:29–38. (In Russ.).
9. Romanov V. N. System analysis and decision making. St. Petersburg: National Mineral and Raw Materials University “Gorny”; 2014. 268 p. (In Russ.).
10. Wouter Van Dooren, Chiara De Caluwé, Zsuzsanna Lonti. How to measure public administration performance: a conceptual model with applications for budgeting, human resources management, and open government. Public Performance & Management Review. 2012;35 (3):489–508.
11. Tampieri Laura. Performance evaluation indexes in public administration some issues of their actual usefulness. Central European Public Administration Review. 2014;3:59–82. DOI: 10.17573/cepar.v3i2.51.
12. Nardo M. Tools for composite indicators building. european commission, EUR 21682 EN. Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy; 2005. 134 p.
13. Greco S., Ishizaka A., Tasiou M. et al. On the methodological framework of composite indices: a review of the issues of weighting, Aggregation, and robustness. Social Indicators Research. 2019;141:61–94. DOI: 10.1007/s11205–017–1832–9
14. Edlins M. Developing a model of empathy for public administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis. 2021;4(1):22–41
15. Saaty T. L. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International journal of services sciences. 2008;1(1):83–98.
Review
For citations:
Eremin V.V. Project Approach 2023: The Need to Use Integral Control Indicators. Economics, taxes & law. 2023;16(1):99-107. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/1999-849X-2023-16-1-99-107
Views:
13
Email this article 