Social Responsibility of Entrepreneurship in the Context of Brexit Challenges
https://doi.org/10.26794/1999-849X-2023-16-5-86-92
Abstract
The subject of the study is the norms of international, integration and national law regulating various aspects of social responsibility of entrepreneurship in the context of the UK’s exit from the European Union.
The purpose of the work is to consider the mechanisms laid down in the international treaties concluded between the European Union and the United Kingdom, which formalized Brexit, and regulated the solution of general issues of social protection and private aspects of social responsibility of business in the context of international disintegration.
It is concluded that, despite Brexit, the British legal system is still partially influenced by EU law, especially with regard to «equal playing conditions», and the social sphere serves as an example in this. The international legal mechanisms adopted during the legal formalization of Brexit laid the foundation for ensuring a sufficient level of convergence of the legal systems of the European Union and the United Kingdom. It is revealed that the concluded agreement on trade and cooperation in relation to the sphere of social responsibility of entrepreneurship can become a model for future trade agreements of both the EU and the United Kingdom, as well as other states and other subjects of international law. The opinion was expressed that the effectiveness of the agreements reached will depend on the measures taken by the parties aimed at restoring balance and implementing obligations in relation to supply chains. It is assumed that the considered regulations in the context of Brexit promise to be significant for the international legal practice of regulating measures of social responsibility of entrepreneurship.
About the Author
D. V. GalushkoRussian Federation
Dmitriy V. Galushko - Dr. Sci. of Law, Associate Professor of the Department of legal regulation of economic activity
Moscow
References
1. Galushko D. V. Theory and practice of legal regulation of integration processes in the light of Brexit challenges. Diss. Dr.. Sci. (Law). Moscow: MGIMO; 2023. 544 p. (In Russ.)
2. Šmejkal V. Competition law and the social market economy goal of the EU. International Comparative Jurisprudence. 2015;1(1):33–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.icj.2015.10.002
3. Ewing K. D. Implications of the post-brexit architecture for labour law. King’s Law Journal. 2017;28(3):403–424.
4. Whiteside N. State Policy and Employment Regulation in Britain: An Historical Perspective. International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations. 2019;35(3):379–400.
5. Shuibhne N. N. Reconnecting free movement of workers and equal treatment in an unequal Europe. European Law Review. 2018;43(4):477–510.
6. Hjorth F. Who benefits? Welfare chauvinism and national stereotypes. European Union Politics. 2016;17(1):3–24.
7. Barnard C., Leinarte E. Brexit & free movement of workers. Lavoro e diritto. 2020;3:441–462. DOI: 10.1441/98122
8. Novitz T. The paradigm of sustainability in a European social context: Collective Participation in Protection of Future Interests? The International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations. 2015;31(3):256–257.
9. Lindstrom N. What’s left for ‘social europe’? brexit and transnational labor market regulation in the uk‑1 and the EU‑27. New Political Economy. 2019;24(2):286–298.
10. Gumbrell-McCormick R., Hyman R. What about the workers? The implications of brexit for british and european labour. Competition & Change. 2017;21(3):169–184.
11. Dougan M. The constitutional dimension to the case law on union citizenship. European Law Review. 2006;31(5):613–641.
12. O’Brien C. R. Between the devil and the deep blue sea: vulnerable EU citizens cast adrift in the UK post-Brexit. Common Market Law Review. 2021;58(2):431–470.
13. Compa L., Vogt J., Gottwald E. Wrong turn for workers’ rights: the us-guatemala cafta labor arbitration ruling — and what to do about it. URL: https://laborrights.org/publications/wrong-turn-workers’-rights-us-guatemala-caftalabor-arbitration-ruling-–-and-what-do.
14. Jay S., Davies P., Reid M. Brexit: Implications for employers. Employee Relations Law Journal. 2016;42(3):69–82.
Review
For citations:
Galushko D.V. Social Responsibility of Entrepreneurship in the Context of Brexit Challenges. Economics, taxes & law. 2023;16(5):86-92. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/1999-849X-2023-16-5-86-92