Preview

Economics, taxes & law

Advanced search

Development of the Methodology for Determining the Indicators of Efficiency and Effectiveness of Higher Education

https://doi.org/10.26794/1999-849X-2023-16-5-68-77

Abstract

The subject of the research is conceptual and methodological approaches to determining key performance indicators for higher education institutions focused on research and technological entrepreneurship.
The purpose of the work is to clarify the methodology for evaluating the effectiveness of R&D in higher education, taking into account the features of science as an environmental economic system and long — term goals of public administration. The study revealed that key performance indicators of science and higher education are often set arbitrarily and, as a result, reflect the results of organizations’ activities biased. Criteria for the selection of indicators of the effectiveness of science and higher education are proposed: connection with the strategy of the state or enterprise; consideration of “environmental” and corresponding indicators.
It is concluded that the methodological approach to evaluating the results of research in higher education is determined by the type of economic system of the country and the presence of a competitive environment. Proposals have been formulated to finalize the targets of the national project “Science and Universities”. The practical significance of the research lies in the possibility of its use by public authorities for the selection of target indicators of projects and programs of higher educational institutions of research orientation.

About the Authors

S. G. Kamolov
Financial University
Russian Federation

Sergey G. Kamolov - Doctor of Economics, Professor of the Public and Municipal Administration Department

Moscow



P. V. Lapshina
Moscow State Institute of International Relations
Russian Federation

Polina V. Lapshina - lead analyst at the Institute for Comparative Studies of Smart Cities

Moscow



References

1. K. Ditkovskiy, M. Kotsemir et al. Science and technology indicators in the Russian Federation: 2022: Data Book. Moscow: HSE, 2022. 400 p. (In Russ.)

2. Drucker P. F. Encyclopedia of management. Moscow: Williams Publishing House; 2004. 432 p. (In Russ.)

3. Geyer R. Can complexity move uk policy beyond ‘’evidence-based policy making’’ and the ‘’audit culture’’? applying a ‘’complexity cascade’’ to education and health policy. Political Studies. 2012;60(1):20–43. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467–9248.2011.00903.x

4. Shore С., Wright S. Audit culture revisited: rankings, ratings, and the reassembling of society. Current Anthropology. 2015;56(3):421–44. DOI: 10.1086/681534.

5. Muller D. Tyranny of Indicators. Moscow: Al’pina Didzhital; 2018. 100 p. (In Russ.)

6. Tambovcev V. L. Control without measurement. Terra Economicus. 2019;17(3):6–29. 29 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.23683/2073–6606–2019–17–3–6–29

7. Altbach G. P. What counts for academic productivity in research universities? International Higher education. 2015;79:6–7.

8. Crane D. Scientists at major and minor universities: a study of productivity and recognition. American Sociological Review American Sociological Review. 1995;30(5):699–714.

9. Thelwall M., Kousha K. Researchers’ attitudes towards the h-index on Twitter 2007–2020: criticism and acceptance. Scientometrics. 2021;126:5361–5368. DOI: 10.1007/s11192–021–03961–8

10. Grogan D., Reddy V., Gupta A., Chang Y., Fields D., Agarwal N. trends in academic spine neurosurgeon productivity as measured by the relative citation ratio. World Neurosurgery, Volume. 2021;147:40–46. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.11.097

11. Merton R. K. The matthew effect in science. Science. 1968;159(3810):56–63.

12. Klejner G. B. System Paradigm and system management. Rossijskij zhurnal menedzhmenta= Russian Journal of Management. 2008;6(3):27–50. (In Russ.).

13. Kaplan R., Norton D. Balanced scorecard: from strategy to action. Moscow: Olympus Business; 2021. 320 p. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Kamolov S.G., Lapshina P.V. Development of the Methodology for Determining the Indicators of Efficiency and Effectiveness of Higher Education. Economics, taxes & law. 2023;16(5):68-77. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/1999-849X-2023-16-5-68-77

Views: 15


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1999-849X (Print)
ISSN 2619-1474 (Online)