<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">etl</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Экономика. Налоги. Право</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Economics, taxes &amp; law</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1999-849X</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2619-1474</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26794/1999-849X-2024-17-5-50-66</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">etl-251</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ЭКОНОМИКА И УПРАВЛЕНИЕ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Возможности государства по продвижению фермерства и сельской кооперации в России</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>The Possibilities of the State to Promote Farming and Rural Cooperation in Russia</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6864-4281</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Щурина</surname><given-names>С. В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Shchurina</surname><given-names>S. V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Светлана Валентиновна Щурина — кандидат экономических наук, доцент, доцент кафедры корпоративных финансов и корпоративного управления</p><p>Москва</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Svetlana V. Shchurina — Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Assoc. Prof., Assoc. Prof. of the Department of Corporate Finance and Corporate Governance</p><p>Moscow</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">sv-valentinovna@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Финансовый университет</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Financial University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2024</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>25</day><month>05</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>17</volume><issue>5</issue><fpage>50</fpage><lpage>66</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Щурина С.В., 2025</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2025</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Щурина С.В.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Shchurina S.V.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://etl.fa.ru/jour/article/view/251">https://etl.fa.ru/jour/article/view/251</self-uri><abstract><p>Предметы исследования — фермерские хозяйства и сельские кооперативы как основы экономического развития сельских территорий. Цель работы — определение приоритетов государства в реализации поддержки фермерских хозяйств и сельской кооперации в России. В статье приведены результаты господдержки фермерских хозяйств и сельских кооперативов. Оценен потенциал госпрограммы финансирования инфраструктуры и качества сельской жизни по обеспечению увеличения ввода благоустроенного жилья на сельских территориях и строительства и реконструкции объектов сельского туризма к 2030 г. Установлено, что полноценному развитию сельской кооперации в России препятствуют противоречия в законодательстве, высокая стоимость кредитных ресурсов, сопряженная с ростом задолженности сельскохозяйственных организаций перед банками. Определены причины непрестижности сельскохозяйственного труда у молодежи вследствие тяжелого физического труда, получения невысоких доходов и высокой стоимости кредитных ресурсов. Как результат — отсутствие больших надежд на рост численности сельского населения к 2030 г.</p><p>Сделаны выводы о необходимости продолжения государственной поддержки фермерства и сельской кооперации для сохранения имеющейся доли сельского населения России и реализации социальной миссии кооперативного движения.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The subjects of the study are farms and rural cooperatives as the basis for the economic development of rural areas. The purpose of the work is to determine the priorities of the state in the implementation of support for farms and rural cooperation in Russia. The article presents the results of state support for farms and rural cooperatives. The potential of the state program for financing infrastructure and the quality of rural life to ensure an increase in the commissioning of comfortable housing in rural areas and the construction and reconstruction of rural tourism facilities by 2030 has been assessed. It has been established that the full-fledged development of rural cooperation in Russia is hindered by contradictions in legislation, the high cost of credit resources associated with an increase in the debt of agricultural organizations to banks and credit cooperatives. The reasons for the lack of prestige of agricultural work among young people due to hard physical labor, low incomes and high cost of credit resources are determined. As a result, there is a lack of high hopes for the growth of the rural population by 2030.</p><p>Conclusions are drawn about the need to continue state support for farming and rural cooperation in order to preserve the existing share of the rural population of Russia and implement the social mission of the cooperative movement.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>фермерство</kwd><kwd>сельская кооперация</kwd><kwd>сельские территории</kwd><kwd>производственный кооператив</kwd><kwd>потребительский кооператив</kwd><kwd>кредитный кооператив</kwd><kwd>сельское хозяйство</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>farming</kwd><kwd>rural cooperation</kwd><kwd>rural territories</kwd><kwd>production cooperative</kwd><kwd>consumer cooperative</kwd><kwd>credit cooperative</kwd><kwd>agriculture</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Туган-Барановский М. И. Социальные основы кооперации. М.: Юрайт. 2019. 418с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tugan-Baranovsky M. I. Social foundations of cooperation. Moscow: Jurayt; 2019. 418 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Чаянов А. В. Основные идеи и формы организации крестьянской кооперации. М.: Наука; 1991. 456 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chayanov A. V. Basic ideas and forms of organization of peasant cooperation. Moscow: Science; 1991. 456 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Чаянов А. В. Избранные произведения. М.: Московский рабочий; 1989. 368 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chayanov A. V. Selected works. Moscow: Moscow worker; 1989. 368p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Экономическое наследие А. В. Чаянова М.: Тончу; 2006. 664 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Economic heritage of A. V. Chayanov. Moscow: Tonchu; 2006. 664 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Антонова М. П., Гатаулина Е. А., Потапова А. А., Скоморохов С. Н. Почему не развивается сельскохозяйственная потребительская кооперация в России? Мнения участников процесса сельскохозяйственной кооперации в вопросах и ответах. М.: Дело. РАНХиГС; 2022. 248 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Antonova M. P., Gataulina E. A., Potapova A. A., Skomorokhov S. N. Why is agricultural consumer cooperation not developing in Russia? Opinions of participants in the process of agricultural cooperation in questions and answ ers. Moscow: Business. RANEPA; 2022. 248 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Янбых Р. Г. Сельскохозяйственная кооперация: являются ли кооперативные принципы догмой? Экономика, труд, управление в сельском хозяйстве. 2018;36(3):2–6.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yanbykh R. G. Agricultural cooperation: are cooperative principles a dogma? Economics, labor, management in agriculture. Ekonomika, trud, upravleniye v sel’skom khozyaystve = Economics, labor, management in agriculture. 2018;36(3):2–6. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fisher E., Qaim M. Smallholder farmers and collective action: what determines the intencity of participation. Journal of Agricultural Economics. 2014;65(3):26–32.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fisher E., Qaim M. Smallholder farmers and collective action: what determines the intencity of participation. Journal of Agricultural Economics. 2014;65(3):26–32.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hendrikse G., Bijman J. Ownership structure in agrifood chains: the marketing cooperative. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 2002;84(1):104–119.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hendrikse G., Bijman J. Ownership structure in agrifood chains: the marketingcooperative. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 2002;84(1): 104–119.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sexton R. J., Sexton T. A. Cooperatives as entrants. The RAND Journal of Economics. 1987:581–595.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sexton R. J., Sexton T. A. Cooperatives as entrants. The RAND Journal of Economics. 1987:581–595.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
