<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">etl</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Экономика. Налоги. Право</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Economics, taxes &amp; law</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1999-849X</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2619-1474</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26794/1999-849X-2022-15-6-33-44</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">etl-228</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ТЕМА ДНЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>TOPIC OF THE DAY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Глобальная социально-экономическая парадигма в системе высшего образования и государственного управления</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Global socio-Economic Paradigm in the system of Higher Education and Public administration</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2991-2877</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Антропов</surname><given-names>В. В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Andropov</surname><given-names>V. V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Владислав Владимирович Антропов — доктор экономических наук, профессор департамента мировых финансов; профессор кафедры экономической теории</p><p>Москва</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Vladislav V. Andropov — Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Prof. of Department of World Finance; Prof. of the Department of Economic Theory</p><p>Moscow</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Финансовый университет; РГУ нефти и газа им. И.М. Губкина</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Financial University; Gubkin Russian State University of Oil and Gas (NRU)</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2022</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>15</day><month>05</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>15</volume><issue>6</issue><fpage>33</fpage><lpage>44</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Антропов В.В., 2025</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2025</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Антропов В.В.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Andropov V.V.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://etl.fa.ru/jour/article/view/228">https://etl.fa.ru/jour/article/view/228</self-uri><abstract><p>Предметы исследования — трансформация глобальной социально-экономической парадигмы и ее влияние на систему высшего образования и государственного управления. Цель работы — выявление факторов трансформации глобальной социально-экономической парадигмы, воздействующих на формирование мировоззренческих установок студентов вузов и проводимую государственную экономическую политику. В статье рассмотрены особенности процесса смены социально-экономических парадигм в экономической теории и экономической политике, исследуются сущность понятия социально-экономической парадигмы и причины ее трансформации с точки зрения философии и методологии науки. Проведен анализ причин, факторов и движущих сил трансформации социально-экономических парадигм в ХIХ в. Показаны особенности перехода от кейнсианской к неолиберальной экономической парадигме. В рамках поиска альтернативы неолиберальной социально-экономической парадигмы исследуются принципы Пекинского консенсуса. Выдвигаются предположения о том, какие должны быть созданы экономические и политические условия после глобального финансово-экономического кризиса, чтобы открывались возможности для перехода от неолиберализма к новой социально-экономической парадигме, несмотря на то, что неолиберальный консенсус будет еще оставаться долгое время актуальным в общественном дискурсе и политике большинства развитых стран Делается вывод о том, что важнейшим фактором формирования социально-экономических парадигм является экономическое образование. После глобального финансово-экономического кризиса 2008–2009 гг. стало очевидным, что ортодоксальные экономические идеи и политика больше не могут способствовать решению основных проблем, стоящих перед западными экономиками и нет гарантий того, что в ближайшие годы не будет смен парадигмы в экономической мысли и политике.  </p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The subjects of the research are the transformation of the global socio-economic paradigm and its impact on the system of higher education and public administration. The purpose of the study is to identify the factors of transformation of the global socio-economic paradigm and to establish its influence on the formation of ideological attitudes of university students and the peculiarities of the state economic policy. The article examines the peculiarities of the process of changing socio-economic paradigms in economic theory and economic policy, explores the concept of socio-economic paradigm and the reasons for its transformation from the point of view of philosophy and methodology of science. The analysis of the causes, factors and driving forces of the transformation of socio-economic paradigms in the nineteenth century is conducted. The features of the transition from the Keynesian to the neoliberal economic paradigm are highlighted. As an alternative to the neoliberal socio-economic paradigm, the principles of the Beijing Consensus are investigated. The degree to which the economic and political conditions that have developed after the global financial and economic crisis open up opportunities for the transition from neoliberalism to a new socio-economic paradigm is assessed. It is concluded that the most important factor in the formation of socio-economic paradigms is economic education. After the global financial and economic crisis of 2008–2009, it became obvious that orthodox economic ideas and policies can no longer adequately solve the main problems facing Western economies. It is concluded that the neoliberal consensus remains dominant, albeit in a modified form, in public discourse and politics in most developed countries. There is no guarantee that there will not be a paradigm shift in economic thought and policy in the coming years.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>социально-экономическая парадигма</kwd><kwd>послевоенный консенсус</kwd><kwd>неолиберальный консенсус</kwd><kwd>Пе- кинский консенсус</kwd><kwd>Корнуоллский консенсус</kwd><kwd>человеческий капитал</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>socio-economic paradigm</kwd><kwd>post-war consensus</kwd><kwd>neoliberal consensus</kwd><kwd>beijing consensus</kwd><kwd>cornish consensus</kwd><kwd>human capital</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="ru">Статья подготовлена на основе научно-исследовательской работы, выполненной в рамках государственного задания 2022 г.</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кун Т. Структура научных революций. М.: Прогресс; 1977. 300 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Кун Т. Структура научных революций. М.: Прогресс; 1977. 300 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kun T. The structure of scientific revolutions. Moscow: Progress; 1977. 300 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kun T. The structure of scientific revolutions. Moscow: Progress; 1977. 300 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лакатос И. Философия и методология научно-исследовательских программ. Избранные произведения по философии и методологии науки. М.: Академический проект; 2008. 475 c.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Лакатос И. Философия и методология научно-исследовательских программ. Избранные произведения по философии и методологии науки. М.: Академический проект; 2008. 475 c.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lakatos I. Philosophy and methodology of scientific research programs // Selected works on philosophy and methodology of science. Moscow: Academic Project; 2008. 475 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lakatos I. Philosophy and methodology of scientific research programs // Selected works on philosophy and methodology of science. Moscow: Academic Project; 2008. 475 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sy W. Endogenous crisis and the economic paradigm. Real-world economics review. 2012. Issue no. 59.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sy W. Endogenous crisis and the economic paradigm. Real-world economics review. 2012. Issue no. 59.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Stiglitz, J. Needed: a new economic paradigm. Financial Times, August 19, 2010. URL: https://www.ft.com/content/d5108f90-abc2–11df-9f02–00144feabdc0.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Stiglitz, J. Needed: a new economic paradigm. Financial Times, August 19, 2010. URL: https://www.ft.com/content/d5108f90-abc2–11df-9f02–00144feabdc0.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Родрик Д. Парадокс глобализации. Демократия и будущее мировой экономики. М.: Изд-во Института Гайдара; 2014. 576 c.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Родрик Д. Парадокс глобализации. Демократия и будущее мировой экономики. М.: Изд-во Института Гайдара; 2014. 576 c.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rodrik D. The paradox of globalization. Democracy and the future of the world economy. Moscow: Publishing House of the Gaidar Institute; 2014. 576 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rodrik D. The paradox of globalization. Democracy and the future of the world economy. Moscow: Publishing House of the Gaidar Institute; 2014. 576 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Jacobs M., Mazzucato M. Rethinking capitalism: economics and policy for sustainable and inclusive growth rethinking capitalism. Wiley Blackwell. 2017.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jacobs M., Mazzucato M. Rethinking capitalism: economics and policy for sustainable and inclusive growth rethinking capitalism. Wiley Blackwell. 2017.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fricke T. Altes Einheitsdenken oder neue vielfalt? Eine systematische auswertung der großen umfragen unter deutschlands wirtschaftswissenschaftler_innen, FGW Studie Neues ökonomisches Denken 03. 2017.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fricke T. Altes Einheitsdenken oder neue vielfalt? Eine systematische auswertung der großen umfragen unter deutschlands wirtschaftswissenschaftler_innen, FGW Studie Neues ökonomisches Denken 03. 2017.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mazzucato M. A new global economic consensus. Social Europe. 14 October 2021. URL: https://socialeurope.eu/a-new-global-economic-consensus</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mazzucato M. A new global economic consensus. Social Europe. 14 October 2021. URL: https://socialeurope.eu/a-new-global-economic-consensus</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ramo J. C. The beijing consensus. The Foreign Policy Centre. London; 2004.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ramo J. C. The beijing consensus. The Foreign Policy Centre. London; 2004.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yasheng H, Rethinking the beijing consensus. Asia Policy. 2011;(11).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yasheng H, Rethinking the beijing consensus. Asia Policy. 2011;(11).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yang Y. The End of the beijing consensus: can china’s model authoritarian growth survive? Foreign Affairs. 2010. URL: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2010–02–02/end-beijing-consensus.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yang Y. The End of the beijing consensus: can china’s model authoritarian growth survive? Foreign Affairs. 2010. URL: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2010–02–02/end-beijing-consensus.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Williamson J. IIE’s williamson: there is no ‘beijing consensus. 2010. international political economy zone. 2010. URL: http://ipezone.blogspot.com/2010/11.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Williamson J. IIE’s williamson: there is no ‘beijing consensus. 2010. international political economy zone. 2010. URL: http://ipezone.blogspot.com/2010/11.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Jash A. De-coding the ‘beijing consensus’: is it an alternative growth model? Yonsei Journal of International Studies. 2015.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jash A. De-coding the ‘beijing consensus’: is it an alternative growth model? Yonsei Journal of International Studies. 2015.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
